IOR1001-fMLP (N-Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe)
fMLP (N-Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe),>97%
【英文同义名】:Chemotactic peptide N-Formyl-L-methionyl-L-leucyl-L-phenylalanine fMLF fMLP, fMetLeuPhe
【中文同义名】:N-甲酰-L-甲硫氨酰-L-白氨酰-L***丙氨酸
订购信息:(原装进口,常备现货)
| 品 牌 | 产品名称 | 产品货号 | 规 格 | 目录价(元) |
| Gene Operation | fMLP (N-Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe) | IOR1001-0005MG | 5MG | ¥1,479.00 |
产品描述
fMLP (N-Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe) 是一种强效嗜中性粒细胞趋化肽,能诱导白细胞的趋化性和巨噬细胞的激活,也是FPR的激动剂 [1,2,3]。N-Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe能诱导巨噬细胞代谢爆发,并伴随有呼吸速率增加,溶酶体酶分泌和超氧阴离子的产生 [2]。N-Formyl-Met-Leu-P能诱导DMSO分化的HL-60细胞氧化爆发,这一过程需要Hsp90的激活,但不需要完整的微管 [4]。
靶点
| 靶点 | Neutrophil chemoattractant | FPR agonist |
化学特性
| Cas No.: 59880-97-6 | 分子量: 437.55 |
| 分子式: C21H31N3O5S | 纯度: >97% |
| 同义名: Chemotactic peptide N-Formyl-L-methionyl-L-leucyl-L-phenylalanine fMLF fMLP, fMetLeuPhe |
| 化学名: (2S)-2-[[(2S)-2-[[(2S)-2-formamido-4-methylsulfanylbutanoyl]amino]-4-methylpentanoyl]amino]-3-phenylpropanoic acid |
| 外观: 白色粉末 |
| 溶解: 溶于DMF (up to 100 mM) |
| 保存::3年 -20℃粉状 |
储存液配制
| 储存液 (1 ml DMSO体系) | 1 mM | 5 mM | 10 mM | 25 mM | 50 mM | 100 mM |
| 质量(mg) | 0.4376 | 2.1878 | 4.3755 | 10.9388 | 21.8775 | 43.7550 |
结构式

使用浓度(仅作参考)
N-Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe的具体使用浓度请参考相关文献,并根据自身实验条件(如实验目的,细胞种类,培养特性等)进行摸索和优化。
参考文献
[1] Showell HJ, et al. The structure-activity relations of synthetic peptides as chemotactic factors and inducers of lysosomal secretion for neutrophils. J Exp Med. 1976 May 1; 143(5):1154-69.
[2] Homma Y, et al. Evidence for differential activation of arachidonic acid metabolism in formylpeptide- and macrophage-activation-factor-stimulated guinea-pig macrophages. Biochem J. 1985 Aug 1; 229(3):643-51.
[3] Bautista AP, Elliott KE. Acute ethanol intoxication regulates f-met-leu-phe-induced chemotaxis and superoxide release by neutrophils and Kupffer cells through modulation of the formyl peptide receptor in the rat. Life Sci. 1994;54(11):721-30.
[4] Vrba J, Modrianský M. N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe-induced oxidative burst in DMSO- differentiated HL-60 cells requires active Hsp90, but not intact microtubules. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2004 Dec;148(2):141-4.